腦控空間本週新聞 (2024-01-06至2014-01-12)

 腦控空間本週新聞 (2024-01-06至2014-01-12)

1. 近日當我談話時，經常重複又重複的講同一段話。他人提醒才知道，原來併多少人的思維感應，就重複多少次，因為每個人的思想頻率不一樣。

2. 當做自由泳姿勢運動，後腦下方有咯咯聲時，即口語方面出現問題，甚是擔心，但腦音發出的聲音是正常。後得提醒，再做一次自由泳姿勢，後腦下方的咯咯聲自動消失，之前的擔心是因爲有病患併腦部所致，疑慮消除。

3. 在 Facebook 討論區，有人提到法庭的判決書沒有法院或政府公章，質疑判決書是否合法和有效。我之前申請人身保護令時，也收到高等法院信件，即時找出來看，發現一樣沒有法院的蓋章，上面只有法官書記的私章。

對於申請人身保護令狀一事，我詳細向高等法院律師說明我申請的是保護自己不受電子武器摧殘，相同於澳洲AVO，但因為香港沒有AVO申請，所以法院職員提供"申請人身保護令狀"的表格，但最後給我的答覆是申請人並非在羈押中，法庭只向人身被羈押的人發出人身保護令。我接信後啼笑皆非，需知腦控即”腦禁錮”，我們的身體是由腦部控制，當腦部被禁錮即形同腦部被羈押。難怪有人懷疑法官是冒牌，我懷疑處理我申請的法官可能是被腦控，或者是控機賤人的狗。我將高院所發出的回覆放上網，供大家參考。

Mind Control Space News this week (January 6 to 12, 2024)

1. Recently when I talking, I often repeated the same sentence over and over again. As reminded that I realized which was being mapping with some perps' thought, As said, how many perps’ mapping caused how many repeat times, because everyone's thought frequency is different.

2. When doing freestyle exercises and there is a gurgling sound under the back of the head, I was so worry about it, it means there is a problem with speaking, but the thought of brain sound is normal. After then, I was reminded by controller, and ask me did freestyle exercises again, this time the sound from my under back head side was disappear. That means the sound caused by mapping the patient. When the mapping separated, the syndrome disappear. The previous worries about brain damage were eliminated.

3. In the Facebook discussion forum, someone mentioned that the court’s judgment did not have the official seal neither the court and the government, questioning whether the judgment is legal and valid. When I applied for a writ of habeas corpus before, I also received a letter from the High Court. I looked it up immediately, I found that there was no seal of the court, only the private seal of the judge clerk.

Regarding the application for a habeas corpus order, I explained in detail that I was applying to protect myself from electronic weapons, stop electronic harassment and torture. Like the Australian AVO. The form was provided by the court staff, but the final answer given to me was that the applicant was not in custody and the court only Issue a habeas corpus order to a person who is in physical custody. I shocking when I receiving the letter. As known that brain control is "brain custody”. Our body is controlled by the brain. When the brain is being custody, it is same as custody. No wonder some people suspect that the judge is a fake. I suspect that the judge who handled my application may be being brain controlled, or already the dog of the metamorphosis mind controller. I posted the reply issued by the High Court to online for your reference.

​